Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content

Nuclear Energy

Process not Postcode: the road to a defensible radioactive waste policy

Blog Post | Scott Ludlam
Friday 9th January 2009, 4:52pm

In response to the Crikey article Radioactive Waste for Christmas:

The Senate Inquiry into my bill to repeal Howard's Commonwealth Radioactive Waste Management Act 2005 received 103 submissions from organisations and individuals. Two public hearings held in Alice Springs and Canberra provided thoughtful and considered input to the Environment, Communication and the Arts Committee's deliberations and final report.

Overall, I would characterise the process as a very constructive one that pooled information and expertise, and encouraged constructive dialogue about a complicated and controversial issue which has rarely been given the space for open debate.

The Nuclear Divide

Greens TV | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Thursday 27th November 2008, 4:22pm

Australian Greens Senator Scott Ludlam, and WA Greens MP Giz Watson, on A Current Affair talking about why Uranium mining, and the Nuclear industry is a bad idea.

Yellowcake fever: toxic and unwanted

Media Release | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 21st November 2008, 12:00am

Premier Barnett’s decision to give the green light to uranium mining in WA is dangerous and undemocratic, according to the Greens (WA).

“The Liberal party were elected with 24 seats in the last election promising open-slather uranium mining. The Labor party won 28 seats on a nuclear-free platform. This government does not have a mandate to allow uranium mining,” said Greens MP Giz Watson.

“I do not have the confidence in our environmental and public health safeguards – the lead poisoning disaster in Esperance and ongoing issues with Alcoa’s operations are case in point,” said Ms Watson.

Senator Scott Ludlam warned that Commonwealth legal protections were of no use either.

“Peter Garrett has gone missing in action. Martin Ferguson is running the show, demanding uranium development at all costs. These are scary times.”

Greens shocked at NT nuclear dump anger

Media Release | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Monday 17th November 2008, 4:28pm

'Martin Ferguson wouldn't build a nuclear dump in Batman'

Australian Greens Senator Scott Ludlam has challenged Resources and Energy Minister Martin Ferguson to visit the site of a proposed nuclear dump at Muckaty Station in the Northern Territory before giving the go-ahead.

Speaking before a protest rally in Alice Springs today ahead of a Senate Inquiry investigating whether the nuclear dump proposal should be stopped, Senator Ludlam said he was shocked at the extent to which traditional owners were being ignored by Minister Ferguson.

Why radiate when you can shine? Greens reject nuclear solution

Media Release | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 14th November 2008, 3:01pm

Senator Scott Ludlam, the Australian Greens spokesperson on nuclear issues is calling on the government to provide a policy briefing for senior official, Ziggy Switkowski, who keeps forgetting that the Rudd government has ruled out nuclear power in Australia.

Dr Switkowski is Chairman of the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation and told a meeting of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy in Adelaide last night, that nuclear power should supply 30% of Australia's energy by 2050.

"Dr Switkowskis is out of step with the science and public opinion, and I've never understood why the Chairman of a Government agency spends so much time promoting an activity that is illegal in Australia. By his own admission, it will take fifteen years before nuclear power is available, yet we can have a safe, efficient renewable energy grid up and running well before then. Why would we radiate, when we can shine?"

Walk Against Warming: Stepping up for Renewable Energy

Media Release | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Thursday 13th November 2008, 12:00am

Hundreds of Western Australians are expected to join people from all over Australia in stepping up the call for renewable energy and steep action on climate change at the annual Walk Against Warming, 10am this Saturday at Cottesloe Beach.

Australian Greens Senator Scott Ludlam will challenge WA Premier Colin Barnett on his government's plans for coal, uranium and freeways rather than invest in a renewable economy.

"Climate change and peak oil are the most serious issues facing us today," Senator Ludlam said. "I am proud to be joining thousands of people this weekend to stand up for a renewable Western Australia.

Green not yellow: New poll supports end to nuclear deal with Russia

Media Release | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Monday 10th November 2008, 2:02pm

The Australian Greens are urging Australia not to proceed with sales of uranium to Russia, in light of a new poll showing strong opposition to the plan.

The Australian Conservation Foundation commissioned Newspoll to conduct a survey of 1,200 people and revealed today that 62 per cent are opposed to selling uranium to countries with nuclear arms.

Greens Nuclear Spokesperson, Senator Scott Ludlam says the poll shows the government is out of step with public opinion.

Open Pool Australian Lightwater Research Reactor

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Monday 10th November 2008, 12:00am

Senator Ludlam (Western Australia) asked the Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research, upon notice, on 4 September 2008:

With reference to the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) Open Pool Australian Lightwater (OPAL) research reactor, located 31 kilometres from Sydney at Lucas Heights:

(1) Since its opening in April 2007, what is the total number of days the reactor functioned compared to when it has been inoperative.

(2) (a) How much has it cost Australia through the closure, the required attempted repairs and the limited function of the reactor since it was restarted; (b) can a breakdown be provided of this total costing; (c) how much of this cost may be expected to be recovered from the Argentinean company, INVAP; and (d) what measures is the Government pursuing in order to recover these costs.

(3) Given the ongoing problems with the reactor, does the Minister agree with the description on ANSTO's website describing the OPAL reactor as ‘world-class'.

(4) What was the total cost for the construction of the reactor.

(5) What are the ongoing annual maintenance and running costs of the reactor.

(6) Can a breakdown be provided of the annual revenues which were: (a) projected to be derived from the operations of the reactor; and (b) actually derived from the operations of the reactor.

(7) Given that the reactor has been unable to deliver its promised four times the amount of radioisotopes for nuclear medicine than its predecessor and related expansion in the nation's capacity for nuclear medicine, from which countries and companies did Australia source its isotopes during the reactor's inactivity.

(8) What contingency measures is the Government putting in place to provide for long-term alternatives to the production of radioisotopes from the reactor.

ANSTO - Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation

Estimates Transcripts | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Wednesday 29th October 2008, 8:51pm

Economics Committee - Thursday 23rd October

Senator LUDLAM-I might just perhaps continue on the line that Senator Eggleston was pursuing. Can
you confirm for us that you do not think that your referral under the EPBC Act for the nuclear materials store should qualify as a nuclear action and be caught under EPBC?

Dr Cameron-That is correct. There is a requirement under the act to define whether or not it is a
controlled action under the act. Our judgement is that because of the nature of what we are doing it would not be a controlled action, but, nevertheless, we have to put our submission, and that determination is made by the department. The department has notified us that it agrees with us that it is not a controlled action.

Iran's nuclear program and Australian sanctions

Speech | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Thursday 16th October 2008, 8:11am

I would like to make some brief comments on Australia’s placement of sanctions on Iran based on concerns around Iran’s nuclear program. I would like to say at the outset that the Australian Greens do not support a nuclear armed Iran under any circumstances whatsoever. The situation with Iran and the concerns that have been rightly raised about its nuclear program highlight the inextricable link between the possession of nuclear reactors and enrichment technology and the capacity to create nuclear weapons. It also highlights many of the key problems that have blocked the political process to eliminating nuclear weapons threats.

Syndicate content