Senator Ludlam (Western Australia) asked the Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research, upon notice, on 4 September 2008:
With reference to the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) Open Pool Australian Lightwater (OPAL) research reactor, located 31 kilometres from Sydney at Lucas Heights:
(1) Since its opening in April 2007, what is the total number of days the reactor functioned compared to when it has been inoperative.
(2) (a) How much has it cost Australia through the closure, the required attempted repairs and the limited function of the reactor since it was restarted; (b) can a breakdown be provided of this total costing; (c) how much of this cost may be expected to be recovered from the Argentinean company, INVAP; and (d) what measures is the Government pursuing in order to recover these costs.
(3) Given the ongoing problems with the reactor, does the Minister agree with the description on ANSTO's website describing the OPAL reactor as ‘world-class'.
(4) What was the total cost for the construction of the reactor.
(5) What are the ongoing annual maintenance and running costs of the reactor.
(6) Can a breakdown be provided of the annual revenues which were: (a) projected to be derived from the operations of the reactor; and (b) actually derived from the operations of the reactor.
(7) Given that the reactor has been unable to deliver its promised four times the amount of radioisotopes for nuclear medicine than its predecessor and related expansion in the nation's capacity for nuclear medicine, from which countries and companies did Australia source its isotopes during the reactor's inactivity.
(8) What contingency measures is the Government putting in place to provide for long-term alternatives to the production of radioisotopes from the reactor.